by: Adi
Haji Taha
Department of Archaeology
and Anthropology,
Faculty of Arts,
Australian National University
One of the projects being
undertaken in the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology,
in cooperation with the National Museum in Kuala Lumpur, concerns
the prehistory of the Malay peninsula as traced through the
excavation of two large rock shelters in the interior of Kelantan
Province in the northeast peninsular Malaysia. The Malay peninsula
itself formed the western part of the huge and now partially
drowned subcontinent of Sundaland during the glacial periods
of the Pleistocene (before 10,000 years ago). It must have
served as a land connection for ancient movements of population
from Asia into Indonesia, and ultimately of course Australia.
Caves in many regions of northern and central peninsular Malaysia
have produced rich archaeology of the millennia going back
well into the Pleistocene, especially in the form of Hoabinhian
stone assemblages utilising edge-flaked river pebbles, an
industry found widely over the whole of mainland Southeast
Asia and South China. In later times, the use of pottery spread
through the peninsula after 4,000 years ago, and in early
historical times after 2,000 years ago it provided ports and
trans-peninsular portages for the developing trade between
India and China.
The area termed Ulu Kelantan,
where my research is being undertaken, is situated in the
deep rainforested interior of Kelantan. The Nenggiri and Galas
rivers traverse the area and have been used extensively for
communications until recent times. The majority of the population
of Ulu Kelantan consists of Orang Asli, Malaysian aboriginal
groups who speak languages belonging to the Mon-Khmer subgroup
of the Austroasiatic family, a family quite different from
the Austronesian family which contains Malay and most Indonesian
languages. Two of the main ethnic groups of Ulu Kelantan are
the Temiar agriculturists and the Mendriq (Negritos) hunters
and gatherers. Ulu Kelantan has lots of limestone rock shelters
with high archaeological potential along the banks of the
main rivers.
In 1993, The Department of Museums
and Antiquity of Malaysia conducted an archaeological survey
in Ulu Kelantan. Two large rock shelters, Gua Chawas and Gua
Peraling , were chosen by me for excavation in 1994. Both
sites have dense occupation layers of the Malaysian Hoabinhian
spanning many millennia, running into the Neolithic phase
of pottery and presumed agriculture and then followed by an
early historical occupation and a modern period of Orang Asli
usage for camping. The Hoabinhian deposits produced much material
which is now being analysed at the ANU, including bones of
food animals, plant remains in the form phytoliths (tiny silica
bodies from stems and leaves), riverine shellfish, locally
manufactured stone tools made from river pebbles and hard
limestone. The Neolithic pottery is mainly cord-marked,
having a roughened surface due to beating during manufacture
with a cord-wrapped piece of wood, and is of a type found
all over the Malay peninsula after 4,000 years ago.
Despite similarities in the
general assemblage of the two sites , there are some interesting
differences. Gua Chawas, which is located far from any river,
was excavated to a depth of three metres. Available radiocarbon
dates from the ANU laboratory started at 10,700 years ago
at a depth of 2.4 metres, but more dating samples are to be
submitted. Gua Chawas produce very exciting evidence in its
upper layers, about 1,000 years ago, for the offering of Buddhist
clay tablets in a tiny side cave. Historians have always believed
that there was an ancient pre-Islamic Malay kingdom situated
deep in the interior of Kelantan. According to ancient Chinese
chronicles, the seat of the kingdom chih-tu,
was one months journey from the eastern coast of the
Malay peninsula.
Paul Wheatley, in his book
The Golden Khersonese, identified Ulu Kelantan
as the most likely location for this kingdom, citing the gold
deposits of the area, mined historically from a few hundred
years ago until the present, as a major attraction. The votive
clay tablets from Gua Chawas, numbering more than 1,000 pieces
(mainly broken), throw some light on this mystery. They are
impressed with Bodhisatva and Avaloketisvara images characteristic
of the Hindu-Buddhist Mahayanist art of the Srivijayan period
of early Southeast Asia history (circa AD 670 - 1100). They
are oval and pear-shaped and some were perhaps mixed with
the cremated ashes of the deceased persons. The tablets are
believed to have been made from clay located in part of the
rock shelter.
Gua Peraling is a massive
rock shelter located close to the Perias River, a tributary
of the Nenggiri. The site produced much denser debris of Hoabinhian
habitation than Gua Chawas, perhaps because of its location
near to water, debris extending here right to the surface
layers of the site. People clearly sat in this shelter manufacturing
their stone tools in huge quantities for a very long time,
although no radio carbon dates have yet been processed for
this site. Some of the pebble tools had ground cutting edges
like tools found in ancient deposits in northern Australia.
A number of secondary Hoabinhian burials were also excavated,
but mainly in poor preservation. Gua Peraling lies close to
a famous archaeological rock shelter called Gua Cha, which
produced many well preserved burials of Hoabinhian and Neolithic
times when excavated by Sieveking in 1954. My re-excavations
at this site in 1979 showed that the Hoabinhian and Neolithic
burials formed a continuous sequence, suggesting rapid cultural
change to a Neolithic material culture at about 3,000 years
ago.
Whether Gua Peraling will
show similar results to Gua Cha is not yet certain, partly
because the upper Neolithic deposits here are very thin. At
present , analysis of the excavated materials from Gua Chawas
and Peraling is at an initial stage. However, these latest
findings will surely contribute immensely to understanding
cultural and historical developments in the area through at
least the past 10,000 years.
(ANU Reporter, issue 16 August
1995, page 7)
Gua
Cha & Other Archaeological Sites
|